Evidence first. Labels proportional to proof.
These standards guide how Robius and Pulse handle sourcing, automation, commercial influence, corrections and difficult claims.
Last updated: 1 August 2026Accuracy before speed
Pulse moves fast, but we still check the source. Every important claim should be traceable to evidence.
Source hierarchy
- For government rules and public-sector action, we prefer official government and regulator records.
- Company and research sources are useful for announcements, but they are still speaking about their own work.
- Independent reporting can confirm a claim, challenge it or add context.
- Several websites repeating the same announcement do not count as several independent confirmations.
AI and automation
Pulse uses automation to find, summarize, group and score public information. Automation helps us work faster, but it is not proof by itself.
Pulse is careful with claims about ownership, investment, regulation, legal effect, procurement and formal relationships.
Original analysis
Pulse Insights looks for patterns across several developments. It does not turn one headline into an opinion article.
An Insight should make its main idea clear, show the evidence behind it, separate company claims from independent support and explain what could change the conclusion.
Editorial independence
- Robius does not accept payment to change a verdict, ranking, Impact rating, Evidence label or source-backed conclusion.
- Sponsored content and paid placements must be labelled clearly.
- Commercial relationships do not grant a company the right to remove accurate reporting.
- Corrections are decided by evidence, not by advertising status.